Amazon AWS vs. RackSpace Cloud Windows 2008 I/O Test

I did a basic test trying to measure the un-tuned out-of-the-box I/O performance of Rackspace Cloud instance with the HDTune utility on a Windows Server 2008 instance. According the the RS documentation their disks are local RAID10. Then I run the same utility on 8 core extra large  EBS backed EC2 instance provided by Amazon (wanted to make sure it is not an issue due to a small EC2 instance size). According to the docs EBS should provide consistent performance of a SAN regardless of the instance type.

Here are the somehow surprising results. I was expecting, that they perform somehow equal but RS is in the range of 300 MB/s whereas the EC2 instance is below 40 MB/s.

Rackspace Cloud with Windows 2008:

AWS with Windows 2008:

Interesting enough also the CPU usage is quite different: 2% only for AWS and 31% for RS.

I welcome any comments and I am aware that the tool is meant to measure disks and not RAID or SAN volumes. Still I am surprised by the huge difference. I wonder if the difference is only due to the difference of local RAID vs. SAN. Also I wonder how is the SAN attached then, since the SAN performance is still worse than my laptop disk.

Comments

  1. Alejandro says:

    How was the response of the remote desktop you had at AWS?

    • Alejandro,

      no habia ningun problema.

      I had the instance running in Ireland with my local client in Munich Germany. Remote desktop using Linux with NX or Windows RDP as described in my book works nice with my DSL connection to internet (16 MBit/s).

      sorry for the late reply, I was running lots of cloud workshops in Australia…

      best,

      Frank

  2. Hi Frank,

    Which one do you think is best cloud solution in terms of price + performance ? AWS or Rackspace?

Speak Your Mind

*